Process Analysis
Examining Writing Practices
From The Compact Reader by Jane A. Aaron
Game rules, car-repair manuals, cookbooks, science textbooks – these and many other familiar works are essentially
process analyses. They explain how to do something (play Monopoly, tune a car),
how to make something (a carrot cake), or how something happens (how our hormones affect our behavior, how a computer stores
and retrieves date). That is, they explain a sequence of actions with a specified result (the process) by dividing it into
its component steps (the analysis). Almost always, the purpose of process analysis is to explain, but sometimes a parallel purpose is to prove something about the process or to
evaluate it; to show how easy it is to change a tire, for instance, or to urge dieters to follow a weight-loss plan on
the grounds of its safety and effectiveness.
Process analysis overlaps several other patterns of development. Process analysis contains division and analysis.
Cause-effect analysis asks why something happens or has results, but process analysis
asks mainly how something happens. Process analysis also overlaps narration,
for the steps of the process are almost always presented in chronological order.
But narration recounts a unique sequence of events with unique result, whereas process analysis explains a series
of steps with a predictable result. You might narrate a particularly exciting baseball game, but you would analyze the
process – the rules – of any baseball game.
Process analysis falls into one of two types:
[directive process:
Ntells how to do or make
something – bake a cake, repair a bike, negotiate a contract.
Noutlines the steps in
the process completely so the reader who follows can have the specific result
Ngenerally addresses
the reader as you (second person), or uses imperative (commanding mood) of verbs, such as “add one egg yolk, stir vigorously”
[explanatory process:
Nprovides information
necessary for readers to understand the process
Npurpose is more to satisfy
the reader’s curiosity than to teach her how to perform it
Nmay address the reader
directly, but third-person he, she, it, and they
are more common
Whether directive or explanatory all contain the following:
Zchronological order
Zdivision into stages
Zdivision into steps
Zsteps are detailed
Zreasons are specified
Ztime is specified
Process Analysis
Examining Writing Practices
From The Compact Reader by Jane A. Aaron
Game rules, car-repair manuals, cookbooks, science textbooks – these and many other familiar works are essentially
process analyses. They explain how to do something (play Monopoly, tune a car),
how to make something (a carrot cake), or how something happens (how our hormones affect our behavior, how a computer stores
and retrieves date). That is, they explain a sequence of actions with a specified result (the process) by dividing it into
its component steps (the analysis). Almost always, the purpose of process analysis is to explain, but sometimes a parallel purpose is to prove something about the process or to
evaluate it; to show how easy it is to change a tire, for instance, or to urge dieters to follow a weight-loss plan on
the grounds of its safety and effectiveness.
Process analysis overlaps several other patterns of development. Process analysis contains division and analysis.
Cause-effect analysis asks why something happens or has results, but process analysis
asks mainly how something happens. Process analysis also overlaps narration,
for the steps of the process are almost always presented in chronological order.
But narration recounts a unique sequence of events with unique result, whereas process analysis explains a series
of steps with a predictable result. You might narrate a particularly exciting baseball game, but you would analyze the
process – the rules – of any baseball game.
Process analysis falls into one of two types:
[directive process:
Ntells how to do or make
something – bake a cake, repair a bike, negotiate a contract.
Noutlines the steps in
the process completely so the reader who follows can have the specific result
Ngenerally addresses
the reader as you (second person), or uses imperative (commanding mood) of verbs, such as “add one egg yolk, stir vigorously”
[explanatory process:
Nprovides information
necessary for readers to understand the process
Npurpose is more to satisfy
the reader’s curiosity than to teach her how to perform it
Nmay address the reader
directly, but third-person he, she, it, and they
are more common
Whether directive or explanatory all contain the following:
Zchronological order
Zdivision into stages
Zdivision into steps
Zsteps are detailed
Zreasons are specified
Ztime is specified
If a handout is available online (e.g., a newspaper article) I might include the appropriate link to the information students
need on this page.
|