Make your own free website on Tripod.com

AP Language & Composition

Classification and Division
Home
Hawthorne Biography
Scarlet Letter Criticism
In Depth...Machiavelli Biography
Ripped from Your Papers #1
Ripped from Your Papers #2
Ripped From Your Papers #3
Ripped From Your Papers #4
Vocabulary Lesson 1
Vocabulary Lesson 2
Vocabulary Lesson 3
Research Sources
AP Practice Test Calendar
Multi Choice Tips and Hints
Ethos, Pathos, Logos - The Foundation of Argument
AP Language & Composition
Your Study Habits
Tone and Attitudes
Fallacies
Active Reading and Annotation
AP Prose Style Calendar
AP Prose Style Chapter Outlines 1-6
AP Prose Style Chapters 7-12
AP Prose Style Ch. 13-16
AP Glossary & Schedules
Glossary Presentations How To
Glossary Tests Study Tips
Passage Analysis Quick Guide
Patterns of Development Schedule, Term 2
Patterns: Description Notes
Narration Mode Notes
Example Mode
Process Analysis
Comparison Contrast Notes
Classification and Division
Definition
Cause and Effect
Outside Reading Schedules/Booklists (scroll all the way down)
Persuasive Speech/Researched Argument
They Say/I Say
They Say I Say Slides Introduction
Cornell Notes How To
Creative Writing

 

 

Classification Mode

 

What is classification?

Sorting things into groups, possibly by like and unlike qualities, to create order: kinds of cars, styles of writing, types of psychotherapy.

 

Purpose: to explain a pattern in a subject that might not have been noticed before.

To persuade readers that one group is superior. Allows readers to see correspondences among like things and distinguish them from unlike things. We can name things, remember them, discuss them.

 

Writers classify primarily to explain a pattern in a subject that might now have been noticed before: for instance, a sportswriter might observe that basketball players tend to fall into one of three groups based on the aggressiveness of their play. Sometimes, writers also classify to persuade readers that one group is superior: the sportswriter might argue

 

3 step process:

  1. separate things into their elements, using division or analysis
  2. isolate similarities among elements
  3. group or classify things based on similarities, matching like with like

 

2 systems for establishing classification:

  1. In a complex system, each part fits firmly in its own class.
  2. In a binary, 2-part, system, two classes are in opposition to each other.

 

Sorting items demands a principle (as well) that determines the groups by distinguishing them.

 

Writing an essay

  Be sure that your general subject forms a class in its own right – that all members share at least one important quality.

  Your principle may suggest a thesis, but be sure the thesis conveys a reason for the classification.

Tentative thesis: Political fund-raising appeals are delivered in any of six ways.

Revised thesis: Of the six ways to deliver political fund-raising appeals, the three that rely on personal contact are generally the most effective.

 

A list, diagram, outline is helpful to ensure that your principle is applied thoroughly and consistently.

 

Organizing:

May be arranged in order of decreasing familiarity or increasing importance or size.

 

Questions to consider when revising:

  1. Will readers see the purpose of your classification?
  2. Is your classification complete?
  3. Is your classification consistent?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Division or Analysis Mode

 

Division comes from Latin meaning “to force asunder or separate”

Analysis comes from Greek meaning “to undo”

  When we use this method, we separate a while into its parts, examine the relations of the parts to each other and to the whole, and reassemble the parts into a new whole (which is informed from our examination).

  This method is essential to understanding and evaluating objects, works, and ideas.

  Foundation of critical thinking: the ability to see beneath the surface; to uncover and test assumptions; to see the importance of context; and to draw and support independent conclusions.

 

A principle of analysis: a framework that determines how you divide the subject and consequently the parts you identify.

  There is a larger goal of “illuminating” the subject (sound like definition?), maybe concluding something about it, maybe evaluating it.

 

Examples of questions and theses:

Q: To what extent is an enormously complex hospital a community in itself?

T: The hospital encompasses such a wide range of personnel and services that it resembles a good-sized town.

Q: What is the appeal of the front-page headlines in the local tabloid newspaper?

T: The newspaper’s front page routinely appeals to readers’ fear of crime, anger at criminals, and sympathy for victims.

 

What to consider when writing:

  If the subject is familiar to readers, then you might not have to justify the principle much, but your details and examples must be vivid and convincing.

  If the subject is unfamiliar, then you should carefully explain the principle, define all specialized terms, distinguish parts from one another, and provide ample illustrations.

  If readers know your subject but may disagree with your way of looking at it, then you should justify as well as explain your principle,  and account for any evidence the may seem not to support your opinion (with counterargument).

 

Organizing your writing:

In intro., let readers know why you are choosing to analyze your subject: Why is it significant? How might the essay relate to their experiences or be otherwise useful to them?

  Unfamiliar subject: maybe summarize or describe a part of it (with anecdote, quotation)

  Familiar subject: surprising fact, unusual perspective

  Evaluative essay: opposing viewpoint

Body: describe parts and offer analysis (maybe part by part)

You might arrange from least to most important, least to most complex, most to least familiar, spatially, or chronologically

Conclusion: Reassemble the parts and return to the whole.

Maybe restate the thesis, summarize what the essay has contributed, consider the influence of the subject in a larger context, or assess the effectiveness/ worth of the subject.

 

Questions to consider when revising:

  1. Is your principle of analysis clear?
  2. Is your analysis complete?
  3. Is your analysis consistent?
  4. Is your analysis well supported?
  5. Is your analysis true to the subject?

 

 

 

If a handout is available online (e.g., a newspaper article) I might include the appropriate link to the information students need on this page.